Tennis Tactics : The Circle Stinger

Here are a few observations of singles tennis strategy, some conventional and some new.  Strategy can be defined simply as how you plan to win.  Great teachers deliver memorable sound bites: “attack the short ball” (Dennis Van der Meer); “get in a position to volley away from the source” (Jim Verdieck).  A very successful high school coach once told me, “Hit it at his backhand and go to the net.”  Jack Kramer boiled it down to “Find out what your opponent can’t do and make him do that.”

Tactics are the tools you use to implement your strategy.  Coach Jim Leighton defined the “basic unit of play” as:  (1) the approach shot, (2) the passing shot, and (3) the first volley.

Figure 1 - Attack the Short Ball

In Leighton’s book “Inside Tennis, Techniques of Winning,” Coach Leighton pointed to Wayne Sabin’s ABC’s of Tennis Strategy: (1) Hit it in, (2) Hit it deep, (3) Hit it to your opponent’s weakness, (4) Move your opponent side to side.

While there is truth to the old suggestion of staying out of “no-man’s land” on a tennis court, mid court shots (approach shots, service returns, balls hit on the rise, etc.) must be mastered.  These shots establish an aggressive court position.  Given two right handed players, Leighton & Sabin suggest a firm approach down the line at the weaker backhand.  This is intended to force a weak passing shot, to be volleyed to the opposite corner.

One of nine players is left handed.  The two handed backhand is often your opponent’s better passing shot.  Differing opponents dictate different approaches, as do your own abilities.  However, there is a common thread in all of these suggestions — tennis players are statistically vulnerable to firm attacks on their backhand.

The success of the Spanish players, most notably Rafa Nadal, is reason to examine a new version of a conventional attacking approach shot. Witness the wear of the grass at Wimbledon. No longer is there a “serve and volley” alley of brown on the court.  There is a new pattern of wear.  There is a “Circle” of wear just inside the base line that indicates a shift in post-service attack.

Figure 2 - The Circle

Once the server serves, he takes an extra step into the court. Not to serve and volley, but to establish an aggressive position inside the Circle. What is hoped for is a defensive return.  A shortened whipping, topspin ball taken inside the baseline can put more pressure on the opponent, than the conventional, underspun approach shot. The modern player’s ability to hit “on-the-rise” has created a new game.

A trump card, based on this idea, is the shot Nadal uses so effectively against Roger Federer.  Nadal’s shortened, topspin, crosscourt attack  from the Circle on Federer’s backhand is a very effective tactic.  As great as Federer is, the relentless pressure from Nadal’s stinger from the Circle eventually yields “unforced” errors, a short ball, or an open court.

An on-the-rise approach from within the Circle can produce more pressure than a volley from behind a serve, or a traditional underspin approach shot.  The reason, of course, is that most volleys and approach shots are underspun and lack the speed of an aggressive, stinging, topspun attack.

What about right-handers and the Circle?   The answer is the “inside-out” forehand, turning 3/4 or more of the court into forehands.

Figure 4 : Inside Out Forehand from the Circle

Running around your backhand is nothing new. While some frown on it, given a much better forehand than backhand, many players use their footwork to turn marginal backhands into more potent forehands. The most effective of these forehands are hit from within the Circle.

One may argue that a forehand from the Circle leaves one vulnerable to the down-the-line passing shot, and that’s true.  It’s much like the left hander’s hooking serve to the right hander in the ‘add’ court. When McEnroe leftied his hooking serve there, a few players including Bjorn Borg had an ability to pass him, threading the needle to a very difficult down the line spot to hit.  But the percentages were in McEnroe’s favor, as the percentages favor the stinging pressure of the Circle attack.

Figure 5 : Borg's return of McEnroe's hooking service

There seems to be a battle for position in the Circle in many of  today’s strategies. If a good coach teaches a player to implement the Circle tactic, they should also teach how to defend it.

Deep, well hit service returns can force the attacker back. Ground strokes are now required to be heavier, and deeper. These shots run the opponent out of the Circle, and now you have a chance, with better ground strokes and returns, to get yourself in the Circle, thus turning  defense into offense.

Figure 6 : Defense Against the Circle

So, you now have some more shots to perfect: (1) the Circle attacking shots, and (2) the inside-out forehand from the backhand side. Remember you have to have good leg and foot work to do this, and you must hit more balls on the rise.  Your goal is the “Circle Stinger,” which now has the advantage of being cross court and at the backhand.

A few more tactics

Pros should play more  balls cross court. Cross court balls are safer. Hit one more cross court ball before you try a counterpunching, two handed backhand down the line.  It is more difficult to change the direction of the ball from a timing perspective.  Those backhands are often late, sliding wide off the sideline. Watch for yourself and you’ll believe.

As Yogi Berra has said, “You can observe a lot by watching.”  I spent another great week at the US Open this year.  Even against the world’s best approach shots, passing shots hit soft enough on an angle create errors or vulnerable volleys.

Figure 7 : Passing Shots

And while conventional wisdom says, don’t drop shot on a hard court, Federer, Nadal, Verdasco and other top professionals now use a forehand drop shot, hit with disguise from the Circle to the open court.  Once you establish the dominance of the Circle Stinger, this shot becomes another weapon.  It takes great touch and a lot of practice.

Women and junior girls should develop use of the short corners on your opponent’s court.  If I had any advice to young girl players, it would be to make your opponent move up and back.  Most girls don’t practice these shots enough.  Learn how to move up and back yourself.   Practice the footwork, and force your opponents to prove they’ve done the same work.

The week before the US Open, Mardy Fish beat Andy Roddick in a memorable match in Cincinnati.   Mardy played excellent defense with a cross-court, looping, forehand “flop” shot. When an attacker with Roddick’s strength is hitting a forehand at 90%+, the flop is effective, yielding fewer mistakes.  You can’t outhit some players’ best shots.  A deep, looping topspin crosscourt ball can’t be easily attacked.  Great players like Fish, or Gael Monfils, swing the racket head at different speeds.   They don’t “pull the trigger” until they’re in the Circle and ready to fire.  Be patient.

The hardest time to play is when you are ahead.  I watched a top 10 men’s player get up 30-0, 40-0, or 40-15 in several key games.  But he didn’t play those points tough, and eventually lost the games. Don’t play loose points when ahead.  And don’t play loose games when up a service break. When you do, pressure shifts from them to you.  Stay hungry when you’re ahead.

A closing thought

The point penalty system and Cyclops line calling machines have helped control the poor sportsmanship that once damaged the reputation of tennis as a ladies’ and gentleman’s sport.  Innovation in the rules and technology has returned respect to the game.  That is a positive change for a great game that is still evolving strategically, and as fun to watch as it has ever been.

Advertisement

6 thoughts on “Tennis Tactics : The Circle Stinger

  1. Coach,
    You’re here deservingly so. You mentioned some great coaches in your article, some I’ve listened to, some I’ve had the great pleasure of being taught by. You are one of those teachers.
    Starting to play tennis in the late 60′s wasn’t an easy task for me, however there were people that knew and played the game quite well that helped me continue my love for this great sport. Coach Jim Leighton and some of his players from Wake Forest were my first teachers and I think it was a great way to start. In 1967 I was taught a different side of the game, a perspective that I could not have gotten any where else. Dr. Walter Johnson invited me to come to Lynchburg, Va to work with him for a short time. He taught me several aspects of the game, most importantly how myself and other young black junior players should conduct ourselves on the court. This lesson took me a long way in tennis and in life.
    Coach Frank King taught me team play at Lexington Senior High School by giving me the opportunity to play on probably one of the greatess high school teams of all time. To Coach Marshall and Coach Fred Ponder who taught me college play at Livingstone College. And you Coach TomParham who taught me how to teach, coach and relate to young players on a level that has crossed over into my career on a very positive note. Thanks to you and to Elon University for including me in a wonderful association.

    Always,
    Bryce M. Holmes

  2. Wanted to thank Coach Parham for his thougthful insight into into the strategies and strokes that have changed contempory pro tennis. I’m glad someone is paying attention and can explain to us who are not sure what we are seeing.

  3. Hi Coach,
    thanks for the great article with many good new points discussed. I like in particular your closing thought which highlights your earlier point made about the wear of the grass at Wimbledon; yes the game has changed and evolved, and the way to win pro matches nowadays is very much alligned to your circle stinger observations for sure. I would just like to add to all these tactics identified that although the pro game might have evolved and changed tactically, what has remained at the top of the game is the observation that only winners and champions play tennis with total disciplined shot selection and execution. That is what separates them out in my opinion and always will.
    The choices each player has before making contact with the ball in my opinion is why tennis is so fun to play and why the pro game keeps getting better to watch.

    I look forward to your next article
    Regards
    John

  4. Pingback: The Next Level of Men’s Tennis | Play is Where Life Is

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.